I saw the the Borat Frat boys (see earlier post) lost their attempt to get a TRO. This is not surprising. I mean, they were (allegedly) duped into making jackasses of themselves on camera "since it was being shown only in Europe [population 500+ million] and not America [population 300 million]." I can imagine the song "Cry me a river" being played in the background as the ruling came down.
Monday, December 11, 2006
Borat Frat suit tossed (for the most part)
Wednesday, December 06, 2006
Lost moving to 10? Give me a break
I saw on CNN that ABC is reportedly moving the show Lost to 10 PM out of fear that American Idol will smash it in the ratings. I can't believe ABC, particularly having experienced that fallout of a fad show (Who Wants to Be a Millionaire) is so scared that American Idol Part 7 or whatever they are up to will continue to carry Fox for yet another season. Have some faith in your product. With a desperation move like that, it's no wonder their network has fallen so far out of favor. At least NBC has finally realized the only way they can carry Thursday night is with a two-hour comedy block. Of course, the fact NBC realized this only now with the return of Scrubs, almost seven years after Seinfeld went off the air and The Apprentice failed to recapture its beloved 18-49 audience in the 9-10 Thursday night timeslot, just goes to show these networks have no confidence in their abilities to draw a loyal audience. I predict Lost at 10 PM will be a bust and I can only hope they will return it to Wednesdays at 9 (or Tuesdays at 9) and hope they can salvage their misstep.
Sunday, December 03, 2006
Considering going to law school? Read this first.
I've been wasting time as of late dispensing free advice to whoever listens. Sort of like those wackos on the street who proclaim the end is near. Although I have no regrets about my law school decision and will happily begin pursuing the legal love for learning post-bar in July, I offer these tid-bits of insight to those of you considering going to law school. If anything can be taken from this advice, it is to take (at least) a year off between undergrad and law school to make sure law school (or whatever graduate program for that matter) is the right decision.
Also, law school is nothing like it is on tv. If you are obsessed with helping people, you should consider social work and read no further. If helping people is not your major motivation, I offer you my free advice for what it's worth.
First, regardless of whether you go to a law school full-time or whether you find a 4-year extended program, you will be incurring a significant amount of debt (average is $100k). This should be your primary consideration assuming you are older than the average 24-year-old student (or even if you are right out from undergrad). Second, you should be aware that the average salary coming out of most law schools (top tiers down to fourth tiers) is roughly $40k, and these are generally public sector jobs.
Regarding legal salaries, most lawyers make a comfortable living. The average salary (overall) is high, but this is because of the disparity in salaries between the lawyers at big firms and the lawyers everywhere else. The top lawyers do start off making six figures to start. These are the students who are in the top 10% (to top 25-50% at a top-tier school) of graduates of the law school class. If you work hard during your first two years of law school and earn your way into this category, that's great. Keep in mind that the average billable hours you will be putting in to ensure that salary will be about 2000/year. This translates to a 40-hour work week, but since you can't bill 8 hours in an 8-hour day, this means you probably are putting in 60-70+ hours a week. After working this lifestyle for about seven years, you may make partner and your work hours may shift, but your responsibilities become tremendously client-centered. I don't mean to tell you all of this as a discouragement, but big firm life (in most big firms) is not for most people. Of course, if you aren't in this top of your class, you will not have these options to worry about.
As only about the top 10% (with some exceptions) will get the kind of work described in the above paragraph, that leaves 90% of the class battling for the rest of the legal jobs. Most fall somewhere among the public sector, which has salaries starting between $30-50k/year depending on your state. The hours are better, but the graduating debt is the same, which means you will be paying it off for much longer. Add this into whatever debt you already owe (credit cards, mortgage, etc.) and you will see why I said the first consideration must be debt. If money isn't an issue, that's fine, but you will probably still need to take a long look at whether you think law is for you and what you will be able to do with your J.D.
As far as what law schools want, they really don't care so long as you can pay the bill. Admissions are calculated through a complex formula of percentages based on GPA and LSAT score - if anyone tells you anything else, they are probably misleading you.
If you decide to pursue law school, are accepted, and can afford it (and even if you can't, some lender will give you the $50k/year expenses that it will cost you), go full-time and see how the chips fall when the first semester grades come out. If you do great, great; if not, you should make a serious consideration for cutting your losses. If my point is not clear by now, it is this: law school isn't for everybody and some people embark on the legal path without really thinking it out fully.
In the alternative, and if it's simply resume enhancement you are seeking, I would recommend pursuing an MBA program (they usually are much cheaper and easier to complete around a work schedule). If your goal is just to find a better job with perhaps some better security, an MBA may provide you that option. Your job may pay for an MBA program; if not, there are obviously educational credits of which your accountant may point out. Regardless of the degree you pursue, most employers are looking for someone who can handle themselves well and have a sense of respect and responsibility. You don't need a law degree to find one.
Friday, December 01, 2006
Cell phones in the bathroom
I find there is a difference between bothersome and annoyance, and while the use of cell phones in the bathroom doesn't really bother me, I do find it particularly annoying. What possibly motivates people to carry on a conversation while they are taking a dump? I can sort of excuse it if they are a doctor on call, but in that case, they would get a page first anyway. I'm only assuming that the toilet-talkers are talking to someone they care absolutely nothing about since I find it pretty disrespectful. So you think my conversation is crap? Tell me, don't actually do it. Geez.
I try and flush the surrounding toilets and urinals and otherwise make a lot of noise so maybe the person on the other end realizes he or she is being crapped on and should opt to call back later.
On the scale of annoying places to talk on your cell phones in public, the bathroom cell phone call probably ranks first, followed by the people who answer during a movie to tell whatever insignificant person who is calling that they are watching a movie. These people aren't doctors, and consequently, nothing can possibly be so life-altering that the phone call must be taken right then right there. That goes double for the calls while you are taking a dump.